Abstract This paper continues a comparative analysis of modern satellite models of the Earth's gravity which we started in [6, 7]. In the cited works, the uniform norms of spherical functions were compared with their gradients for individual harmonics of the geopotential expansion [6] and the potential differences were compared with the gravitational accelerations obtained in various models of the Earth's gravity [7]. In practice, it is important to know how consistently the EAS motion is represented by various geopotential models. Unless otherwise stated, a model version in which the equations of motion are written using the classical Encke scheme and integrated together with the variation equations by the implicit one-step Everhart's algorithm [1] was used. When calculating coordinates and velocities on the integration step (at given instants of time), the approximate Everhart formula was employed.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Comparative Analysis of Models of the Earth's Gravity: 3. Accuracy of Predicting EAS Motion


    Contributors:

    Published in:

    Cosmic Research ; 40 , 3 ; 305-312


    Publication date :

    2002-05-01


    Size :

    8 pages




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English




    Comparative Analysis of Models of the Earth's Gravity: 3. Accuracy of Predicting EAS Motion

    Kuznetsov, E. D. / Berland, V. E. / Wiebe, Yu. S. et al. | Online Contents | 2002


    Earth's Gravity

    Landgraf, Markus | TIB AV-Portal | 2015


    Accuracy of Earth's Thermospheric Neutral Density Models

    Marcos, Frank / Bowman, Bruce / Sheehan, Robert | AIAA | 2006


    Predicting the Earth's future

    Dutton, John A. | Elsevier | 1987


    Predicting earth's dynamic changes

    Rasool, S. I. | NTRS | 1986