The transfer of Navy Combat Logistics Force ships to Military Sealift Command is viewed by many as a positive change. This paper surveys the reality of the projected cost savings and the availability of merchant mariners in sufficient numbers to meet the defense requirements in the year 2000. This paper discusses the qualitative factors such as, unit self-defense and survivability, civilians in the war zone, operational tempo and command and control. What emerges is that it is cost effective to replace military with civilian crews but the price paid will be in diminishing ship capabilities which will impact the commander's mission. Recommendations include delaying the further transfer of ships until the results of the AFS class can be reviewed, implement a merchant marine reserve and increasing the size of the military detachment on board MSC ships.... Combat Logistics Force Fleet, Military Sealift Command.
Pied Piper: Navy's Transfer of Combat Logistics Force Fleet
1993
34 pages
Report
No indication
English
Logistics Military Facilities & Supplies , Logistics , Navy , Costs , Crews , Missions , Requirements , Savings , Ships , Surveys , Survivability , Warfare , Cost engineering , Navy combat logistics force , Military sealift command , Merchant Marines , Unit self defense and survivability , Civilians in the war zone , Operational tempo , Comand and control , Combat logistics force fleet , Economic impact
Issues and Options for the Navy's Combat Logistics Force
NTIS | 1988
|Options for the Navy's Future Fleet
NTIS | 2006
Options for the Navy's Future Fleet
NTIS | 2006