Comparing and validating models of driver steering behaviour in collision avoidance and vehicle stabilisation
Comparing and validating models of driver steering behaviour in collision avoidance and vehicle stabilisation
- New search for: Markkula, G.
- New search for: Benderius, O.
- New search for: Wahde, M.
- New search for: Markkula, G.
- New search for: Benderius, O.
- New search for: Wahde, M.
A number of driver models were fitted to a large data set of human truck driving, from a simulated near-crash, low-friction scenario, yielding two main insights: steering to avoid a collision was best described as an open-loop manoeuvre of predetermined duration, but with situation-adapted amplitude, and subsequent vehicle stabilisation could to a large extent be accounted for by a simple yaw rate nulling control law. These two phenomena, which could be hypothesised to generalise to passenger car driving, were found to determine the ability of four driver models adopted from the literature to fit the human data. Based on the obtained results, it is argued that the concept of internal vehicle models may be less valuable when modelling driver behaviour in non-routine situations such as near-crashes, where behaviour may be better described as direct responses to salient perceptual cues. Some methodological issues in comparing and validating driver models are also discussed.
Document information
Comparing and validating models of driver steering behaviour in collision avoidance and vehicle stabilisation
Vehicle System Dynamics ; 52 , 12 ; 1658-1680
2014
23 Seiten, 10 Bilder, 3 Tabellen, 58 Quellen
Article (Journal)
English
Similar titles
| Automotive engineering | 2014
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2014
Emergency steering control of autonomous vehicle for collision avoidance and stabilisation
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2019
Driver behaviour & perceived safety in collision avoidance situations
| Tema Archive | 2011
Driver sitting position controlled vehicle collision avoidance
| European Patent Office | 2019