The impact performance of the Texas Metal Beam Guard Fence median barrier (MBGF) was determined and compared with that of the Texas Concrete Median Barrier (CMB). The MBGF consists of two standard W-shaped guardrails mounted back-to-back on a 6 WF 8.5 support post whereas the CMB is a solid concrete barrier. The impact performance of the MBGF was determined from a combination of crash tests and from crash simulations by the Highway-Vehicle-Object-Simulation-Model (HVOSM). Full-size automobiles (approximately 4,000 lb) were used in both the crash tests and the crash simulations. A close comparison of test and simulated results verified the accuracy of the HVOSM in simulating impacts with the MBGF. The impact performance of the CMB was obtained from another study.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Impact Performance and a Selection Criterion for Texas Median Barriers


    Contributors:
    H. E. Ross (author)

    Publication date :

    1974


    Size :

    129 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English




    Impact performance and an evaluation criterion for median barriers

    Ross.H.E. / Nixon,J.F. / Texas A and M Univ.,Texas Transp.Inst.,US et al. | Automotive engineering | 1976


    Assessment of Median Barriers

    C. J. Khisty | NTIS | 1986


    Median Barrier Guidelines for Texas

    R. Bligh / S. P. Miaou / D. Lord et al. | NTIS | 2006


    Signs on Concrete Median Barriers

    A. Abu-Odeh / W. Williams / R. Ferdous et al. | NTIS | 2013


    A Median Study in Baytown, Texas

    C. V. Wootan / H. G. Meuth / N. J. Rowan et al. | NTIS | 1964