This thesis compares the processes of acquisition for ship construction projects in the Royal Australian Navy and the United States Navy. It examines the problems associated with government furnished equipment with regard to specifications, timing, quality assurance, and cost. The requirements of standardisation, commonality, and interoperability with allied nations is also discussed. The differences are not many, and can be attributed to the demographic aspects of each country, and the fact there is always more than one way of operating. The process theoretically should flow smoothly from one phase to the next, however, differences between authorities on minor aspects can lead to delays in the total project. A proposal for a replacement shipbuilding programme for the Royal Australian Navy is presented, whereby the fleet would be continually updated with new ships and new weapon systems on a cyclical basis. This proposal would increase involvement by Australian industries in warships for Australia. It would also solve many of the current problems with government furnished equipment, and provide a substantial degree of standardisation. (Author)
A Comparison of the Acquisition Process for Ship Construction Projects of the Royal Australian Navy and the United States Navy
1981
103 pages
Report
No indication
English
Logistics Military Facilities & Supplies , Management Practice , Marine Engineering , Naval procurement , Shipbuilding , Management , Navy , Naval vessels , Acquisition , Standardization , Quality assurance , Scheduling , Policies , Replacement , Shipyards , Naval shore facilities , Contract administration , United States , Australia , Department of Defense , Comparison , Government furnished equipment , Interoperability
Hydrographic Service Royal Australian Navy
NTIS | 1993
Hydrographic Service. Royal Australian Navy
NTIS | 1996
Planning for Navy Ship Acquisition
NTIS | 1978
|The Royal Australian Navy Stability Standard
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000
|