The aircraft demonstrated a 1.6-hour mean time between failures and a 1.5-hour mean time between aircrew writeups. The overall aircraft reliability was significantly degraded by the low reliability of the flight controls and most avionics subsystems. The reliability of most non-avionics subsystems was acceptable. The contractor predicted that 23.8 maintenance manhours per flying hour would be required, and 48.0 manhours were actually measured; the difference was attributed to low reliability. Except for excessive removal, bench check, and replacement of good components during troubleshooting, the maintainability of the FB-111A was good.
Category II FB-111A Reliability and Maintainability Evaluation
1972
88 pages
Report
No indication
English
Aircraft , Quality Control & Reliability , Logistics Military Facilities & Supplies , Jet fighters , Maintainability , Reliability , Supersonic aircraft , Flight testing , Reliability(Electronics) , Maintenance , Spare parts , Replacement theory , Aircraft equipment , Electronic equipment , Failure(Mechanics) , Failure(Electronics) , Flight control systems , Performance(Engineering) , Fb-111a aircraft , Avionics , Category 2 tests , F-111 aircraft , Mean time between failures
F-111A Wing Fatigue Test Program
NTIS | 1976
|FB-111A Aircrew Use of Temazepam during Surge Operations
NTIS | 1987
|Reliability and maintainability
Online Contents | 1994
Reliability and maintainability
TIBKAT | 1995
|