Additional Cost Transparency and Design Criteria Needed for National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Projects
Additional Cost Transparency and Design Criteria Needed for National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Projects
- New search for: C. Chaplain
- New search for: C. Chaplain
Our work over the past three years has shown that NASA's major projects are frequently approved without evidence of a sound business case-- ensuring a match between requirements and resources--and, therefore, cost more and take longer to develop than planned. Our March 2011 assessment found that 13 NASA projects that established baselines prior to fiscal year 2009 had experienced an average cost growth of almost 55 percent, with a combined increase in development costs of almost $2.5 billion from their baselines established at their Confirmation Review. While NASA has taken steps over recent years to help improve its acquisition management through several initiatives aimed at improving cost estimating and management oversight, the overall outcomes of these efforts will take time to become apparent. Based on the findings of our past three assessments, we are recommending that NASA (1) provide increased transparency into project costs to the Congress to conduct oversight and ensure earlier accountability and (2) develop a common set of measurable and proven criteria to assess the design stability of projects before proceeding into later phases of development.
Document information
Additional Cost Transparency and Design Criteria Needed for National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Projects
2011
14 pages
Report
No indication
English