With the creation of the newest regionally focused unified combatant command, questions arose about the ability of U.S. Africa Command (USAFRICOM) to attain full operationalization. Indeed, from a legal perspective, numerous challenges have yet to be resolved or addressed. This article considers those legal challenges by first examining USAFRICOM's articulated mission and organizational structure. Moreover, an analysis of the legal instruments that would enable full operationalization is necessary, as well as a candid assessment of any agreements currently in force. Integral to that assessment is the perspective of the intended beneficiaries of the command. Additionally, one must consider the fiscal laws and statutory constraints that may pose an impediment in realizing the stated mission of USAFRICOM. Finally, recommendations are offered. This essay demonstrates that absent substantial expansion of international agreements in the new command, coupled with significant revision to existing statutes, USAFRICOM is unlikely to have an impact beyond the status quo.
Legal Impediments to USAFRICOM Operationalization
2008
8 pages
Report
No indication
English
Behavior & Society , International Relations , Social Concerns , Military Sciences , Management Practice , Foreign policy , Africa , International law , International relations , Government(Foreign) , Expansion , Diplomacy , Diplomats , Law enforcement , Instrumentation , Missions , Fiscal policies , Organizations , Usafricom(U s africa command) , Sofa(Status of forces agreement)
Systems Integration and Operationalization
NTRS | 2019
|A Survey on Legal Impediments to Nonpunitive Safety Occurrence Reporting in Europe
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2003
|SAE Technical Papers | 2016
|Operationalization of path walkability for sustainable transportation
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2017
|