Highlights Best practice guidelines in child occupant safety determine child-seat fit by the child’s weight/height and a seat’s manufacturer guidelines. Compared to other seats, belt positioning booster seats allow children more mobility and flexibility to sit in a range of postures. Younger children may be physically compatible with booster seats, but not behaviorally mature enough to use them appropriately. A wide range of errors and time inappropriately restrained suggests the importance of individual child differences when choosing or transitioning restraint systems.

    Abstract Introduction Child weight and height are the basis of manufacturer and best practice guidelines for child restraint system use. However, these guides do not address behavioral differences among children of similar age, weight, and height, which may result in child-induced restraint use errors. The objective of this study was to characterize child behaviors across age in relation to appropriate restraint system use during simulated drives. Methods: Fifty mother–child (4–8 years) dyads completed an installation into a driving simulator, followed by a simulated drive that was video-recorded and coded for child-induced errors. Time inappropriately restrained was measured as the total amount of the simulated drive spent in an improper or unsafe position for the restraint to be effective divided by the total drive time. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine differences across age in the frequency of error events and overall time inappropriately restrained. Results: Children in harnessed seats had no observed errors during trips. Within children sitting in booster seats there were differences in time inappropriately restrained across age (p = 0.01), with 4 year-olds spending on average 67% (Median = 76%) of the drive inappropriately restrained, compared to the rest of the age categories spending less than 28% (Medians ranged from 3% to 23%). Conclusion: Some children may be physically compatible with booster seats, but not behaviorally mature enough to safely use them. More research is needed that examines how child behavior influences child passenger safety. Practical Applications: Not all children physically big enough are behaviorally ready to use belt positioning booster seats. Primary sources of information should provide caregivers with individualized guidance about when it is appropriate to transition children out of harnessed seats. Additionally, best practice guidelines should be updated to reflect what behaviors are needed from children to safely use specific types of child restraint systems.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Variations in booster seat use by child characteristics



    Published in:

    Publication date :

    2020-04-16


    Size :

    7 pages




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English




    child booster seat

    CHO DONG WOO / SON JUNG SUP / HWANG SOON HYUN et al. | European Patent Office | 2023

    Free access

    child booster seat

    European Patent Office | 2024

    Free access

    Integrated child booster seat

    KAKISHIMA YASUO / KULKARNI PANKAJ | European Patent Office | 2020

    Free access

    INTEGRATED CHILD BOOSTER SEAT

    KAKISHIMA YASUO / KULKARNI PANKAJ | European Patent Office | 2020

    Free access

    INTEGRATED CHILD BOOSTER SEAT

    KAKISHIMA YASUO / KULKARNI PANKAJ | European Patent Office | 2020

    Free access