AbstractIntroductionWith the increase in automated driver support systems, drivers are shifting from operating their vehicles to supervising their automation. As a result, it is important to understand how drivers interact with these automated systems and evaluate their effect on driver responses to safety critical events. This study aimed to identify how drivers responded when experiencing a safety critical event in automated vehicles while also engaged in non-driving tasks.MethodIn total 48 participants were included in this driving simulator study with two levels of automated driving: (a) driving with no automation and (b) driving with adaptive cruise control (ACC) and lane keeping (LK) systems engaged; and also two levels of a non-driving task (a) watching a movie or (b) no non-driving task. In addition to driving performance measures, non-driving task performance and the mean glance duration for the non-driving task were compared between the two levels of automated driving.ResultsDrivers using the automated systems responded worse than those manually driving in terms of reaction time, lane departure duration, and maximum steering wheel angle to an induced lane departure event. These results also found that non-driving tasks further impaired driver responses to a safety critical event in the automated system condition.ConclusionIn the automated driving condition, driver responses to the safety critical events were slower, especially when engaged in a non-driving task.Practical applicationTraditional driver performance variables may not necessarily effectively and accurately evaluate driver responses to events when supervising autonomous vehicle systems. Thus, it is important to develop and use appropriate variables to quantify drivers' performance under these conditions.
HighlightsThis study quantified drivers’ response to a safety critical event during automated driving while engaging in a non-driving task.48 participants drove in a simulator that had two levels of automated driving and two levels of a non-driving task.In automated condition drivers had longer reaction time and worse lateral control during the safety critical event.Some measures of driving performance may not be valid or meaningful to compare manual driving to supervising automated vehicles.
Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks
Journal of Safety Research ; 61 ; 149-155
2017-02-20
7 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks
Online Contents | 2017
|Assessing Truck Drivers’ and Fleet Managers’ Opinions Towards Highly Automated Driving
Springer Verlag | 2016
|European Patent Office | 2023
|European Patent Office | 2022
|