Highlights Visibility aid prevalence is low among injured bicyclists. In daylight, white or light upper body clothing decreased the odds of a bicyclist–motor vehicle crash. In the dark, red/orange/yellow upper body clothing and tail lights increased the odds of a bicyclist–motor vehicle crash. Using multiple visibility aids is associated with reduced odds of severe injury in bicyclists.

    Abstract Background Little is known about the effectiveness of visibility aids (VAs; e.g., reflectors, lights, fluorescent clothing) in reducing the risk of a bicyclist–motor-vehicle (MV) collision. Purpose To determine if VAs reduce the risk of a bicyclist–MV collision. Methods Cases were bicyclists struck by a MV and assessed at Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, emergency departments (EDs) from May 2008 to October 2010. Controls were bicyclists with non-MV injuries. Participants were interviewed about their personal and injury characteristics, including use of VAs. Injury information was collected from charts. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for VAs during daylight and dark conditions, and adjusted for confounders using logistic regression. Missing values were imputed using chained equations and adjusted OR estimates from the imputed data were calculated. Results There were 2403 injured bicyclists including 278 cases. After adjusting for age, sex, type of bicycling (commuting vs. recreational) and bicyclist speed, white compared with black (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.28, 0.95), and bicyclist self-reported light compared with dark coloured (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.49, 0.92) upper body clothing reduced the odds of a MV collision during daylight. After imputing missing values, white compared with black (OR 0.57; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.99) and bicyclist self-reported light compared with dark coloured (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.52, 0.97) upper body clothing remained protective against MV collision in daylight conditions. During dark conditions, crude estimates indicated that reflective clothing or other items, red/orange/yellow front upper body clothing compared with black, fluorescent clothing, headlights and tail lights were estimated to increase the odds of a MV collision. An imputed adjusted analysis revealed that red/orange/yellow front upper body clothing colour (OR 4.11; 95% CI 1.06, 15.99) and tail lights (OR 2.54; 95% CI: 1.06, 6.07) remained the only significant risk factors for MV collisions. One or more visibility aids reduced the odds of a bicyclist MV collision resulting in hospitalization. Conclusions Bicyclist clothing choice may be important in reducing the risk of MV collision. The protective effect of visibility aids varies based on light conditions, and non-bicyclist risk factors also need to be considered.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    The relationship between visibility aid use and motor vehicle related injuries among bicyclists presenting to emergency departments


    Contributors:

    Published in:

    Publication date :

    2013-12-25


    Size :

    12 pages




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English






    Injuries to Pedestrians and Bicyclists: A Look at Non-Motor Vehicle and Non-Roadway Events

    Stutts, J. C. / Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997


    Senior Drivers, Bicyclists and Pedestrian Behavior Related with Traffic Accidents and Injuries

    Fornells, Alba / Parera, Núria / Ferrer, Adria et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2017


    Senior Drivers, Bicyclists and Pedestrian Behavior Related with Traffic Accidents and Injuries

    Ferrer, Adria / Fornells, Alba / Fiorentino, Anita et al. | SAE Technical Papers | 2017