AbstractHelmets reduce the frequency and severity of head and brain injuries over a range of impact severities broader than those covered by the impact attenuation standards. Our goal was to document the impact attenuation performance of common helmet types over a wide range of impact speeds. Sixty-five drop tests were performed against the side of 10 different helmets onto a flat anvil at impact speeds of 0.9–10.1m/s (energy=2–260J; equivalent drop heights of 0.04–5.2m). Three non-approved beanie helmets performed poorly, with the worst helmet reaching a peak headform acceleration of 852g at 29J. Three full-face and one open-face helmet responded similarly from about 100g at 30J to between 292g and 344g at 256–260J. Three shorty style helmets responded like the full-face helmets up to 150J, above which varying degrees of foam densification appeared to occur. Impact restitution values varied from 0.19 to 0.46. A three-parameter model successfully captured the plateau and densification responses exhibited by the various helmets (R2=0.95–0.99). Helmet responses varied with foam thickness, foam material and possibly shell material, with the largest response differences consistent with either the presence/absence of a foam liner or the densification of the foam liner.
The impact response of motorcycle helmets at different impact severities
Accident Analysis and Prevention ; 42 , 6 ; 1778-1784
2010-04-22
7 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
The impact response of motorcycle helmets at different impact severities
Online Contents | 2010
|The impact response of traditional and BMX-style bicycle helmets at different impact severities
Online Contents | 2016
|Modelling of the impact response of motorcycle helmets
Automotive engineering | 1994
|