The design of the science planning process for a space science mission needs to find a balance between operational and resource constraints and scientific decision-making. Science planning has previously been characterized as either predictive or reactive. Predictive science planning is needed when constraints drive science activities to be planned far in advance. For example, a combination of long one-way light time plus high-stakes science decisions drove the Cassini-Huygens mission to Saturn to have an extremely predictive planning process. On the other extreme, reactive science planning is needed when constraints drive science activities to be planned based on the results of the previous plan. For example, the Mars Exploration Rover mission interacted with the surface of Mars, and so the planning team needed to know the state of the rover at the end of each planning cycle before starting the next cycle. Operational and resource constraints that require management on intermediate timescales has led to the development of a science planning process between these two extremes. For example, the Mars Science Laboratory is a technically complex rover and has a parallel predictive process that allows the operations team to manage engineering constraints several days in advance while maintaining the reactive tactical planning process similar to that of MER. The Mars 2020 Perseverance rover is a technically complex rover in the MSL style, but has an added layer of science complexity: it is tasked with collecting a returnable cache of scientifically valuable samples of Mars within prime mission. Thus, the science planning process also needs to accommodate high-stakes longer-term science decisions in the style of Cassini. In order to balance the push-pull of these constraints, we have developed a science campaign-focused operational paradigm for Mars 2020 Perseverance that allows for both predictive planning to accommodate technological complexity and high-stakes science decisions as well as reactive planning to accommodate the realities of interacting with the martian surface. This paradigm influenced the design of operational processes and operational tools.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff über TIB

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Balancing Predictive and Reactive Science Planning for Mars 2020 Perseverance


    Beteiligte:

    Erscheinungsdatum :

    2022-03-05


    Medientyp :

    Preprint


    Format :

    Keine Angabe


    Sprache :

    Englisch



    Balancing Predictive and Reactive Science Planning for Mars 2020 Perseverance

    Milkovich, Sarah M / Stack, Kathryn M / Sun, Vivian Z et al. | IEEE | 2022


    Mars 2020 Perseverance

    Trosper, Jennifer Harris | NTRS | 2021


    Mars 2020 Perseverance

    Abilleira, Fernando | NTRS | 2020


    Mars 2020 Perseverance

    Trosper, Jennifer Harris | NTRS | 2021


    Mars 2020 / Perseverance / Ingenuity

    Wilson, Michael G. | NTRS | 2021