NASA at Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) and the U.S. Army at Redstone Arsenal were analyzed to determine whether they were successful in implementing their risk management program. Risk management implementation surveys were distributed to aid in this analysis. The scope is limited to NASA S&MA (Safety and Mission Assurance) at MSFC, including applicable support contractors, and the US Army Engineering Directorate, including applicable contractors, located at Redstone Arsenal. NASA has moderately higher risk management implementation survey scores than the Army. Accordingly, the implementation of the risk management program at NASA is considered good while only two of five of the survey categories indicated that the risk management implementation is good at the Army.
Engineering Management Capstone Project EM 697: Compare and Contrast Risk Management Implementation at NASA and the US Army
International Conference on Industry, Engineering and Management Systems ; 2002 ; Cocoa Beach, FL, United States
2002-01-01
Preprint
Keine Angabe
Englisch