This paper will depict in generic terms, the current process for applying costs and processing paper work upon the discovery of missing on induction (MOl) repairable components or subassemblies of an Aviation Depot Level Repairable (AvDLR) upon its induction for repair. Fleet maintenance is removing subcomponents out of AVDLR's declining inventory of subcomponents. Maintenance could use these uncertified subassemblies causing possible loss of property and or life. When NADEPs replace missing components, they are unable to charge back costs to the fleet or unit. Safety of Flight possible side effects are also considered. Some current procedures are being suspended by Aviation Supply Office (ASO) and not communicated to the fleet. Listed are proposals for changes to these procedures. Some changes will be needed at the depot level, while others will require a change in higher level directives.
AVDLR'S and the MOI Dilemma at Naval Depots
1994
17 pages
Report
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Logistics Military Facilities & Supplies , Cost effectiveness , Logistics management , Maintenance , Congress , Department of defense , Military requirements , Military strategy , Naval aviation , Commerce , Competition , Decision making , Management , Production , Processing , Navy , Reports , Costs , Repair , Supply depots , Fleets(Ships) , Parts , Naval budgets , Inventory control , Aviation safety , Military commanders , Repair shops , Salvage , Moi(Missing on induction) , Repairables , Avdlr(Aviation depot level repairable) , Fleet maintenance , Aso(Aviation supply office) , Dmrd(Defense management report decisions) , Safety of flight
Use of traveling cranes in large naval depots
Engineering Index Backfile | 1930
|Online Contents | 1993
British Library Online Contents | 1993
Railway depots, stations & terminals
SLUB | 2015
|